John Steinbeck's Of Mice and Men:An Analysis of Moral Themes and Political Correctness

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on John Steinbeck's Of Mice and Men:An Analysis of Moral Themes and Political Correctness. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality John Steinbeck's Of Mice and Men:An Analysis of Moral Themes and Political Correctness paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in John Steinbeck's Of Mice and Men:An Analysis of Moral Themes and Political Correctness, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your John Steinbeck's Of Mice and Men:An Analysis of Moral Themes and Political Correctness paper at affordable prices!

John Steinbeck's Of Mice and Men

An Analysis of Moral Themes and Political Correctness

Dustin Ronald White

Honors Sophomore English, Period 4

Mrs. King

June , 00

John Steinbeck's Of Mice and Men

Take-Home Essay Test Outline

Directions

Of Mice and Men is a very controversial book, often on the 'Banned Books' list. Analyze the moral theme(s) presented in the book, and argue whether it is justifiably on the list or if everybody should read it.

Goals

q Analyze the moral theme(s) presented in the book

o - Themes, with at least 1 example for each theme

q Is its placement on the 'Banned Books' list justifiable? NO. Why?

o - Reasons, with at least 1 example for each reason

Moral themes

q Judgment

o Does Lennie deserve the punishment he receives as a consequence of his mental retardation?

q Importance of 'thought before action'

o By seeing Lennie's mistakes via his actions toward accidentally killing things

o George knows that Lennie cannot take care of himself; so why does George leave Lennie to himself in the barn (which is out of site of George) while George plays horseshoes.

q Illustrates the importance of looking after those that can't for themselves

o Those that haven't learned how to respond to events should not be penalized for their ignorance. It is like punishing a toddler for not sharing; they simply cannot grasp the idea.

Why everyone should read the book

q Demonstrates the of a migratory farmer of the 10's.

q Explains the significance of companionship.

q This book should not be rejected for foul language unless it is in poor taste and portrayed in a manner other than to set the personality of a specific stereotype or character; and it is not. This book uses foul language to set the personality and the way people spoke as migratory farmers.

q Portrays American lust for Naturalism.

Possibilities of why this book should be banned

q Depicts human nature in its most raw form, which is in effect demeaning of our current beliefs of civil behavior. (But it is necessary to be shown to demonstrate human behavior in this time period and how low people can be and to what depths they will result to for the sake of being superior)

Conclusion

q Pros outweigh the cons.

John Steinbeck's Of Mice and Men is a spectacular illustration of the American lust for Naturalistic literature. The bulk story takes place on a farming ranch in southern California. The main characters of the story, George, the hard-working dreamer, and Lennie, the mentally retarded giant of a man that serves as a mainstay for George, form the foundation of the books moral themes and demonstrate the life of migratory farmers of the 10's. The moral themes of this book are based upon the concepts of judgment and 'thought before action', and the importance of looking out for those who cannot do so for themselves. Through its foul language and grueling depiction of human nature, Of Mice and Men is the center of much controversy and in many cases has been placed on the 'Banned Books' list which leads to a most demanding question is this placement justifiable or should it be read by everyone?

Through his lack of response to events and troubling likelihood of forgetfulness due to his mental retardation, one begins to wonder if the punishment of Lennie's incompetence is justifiable. One must put such a question into perspective; if a newborn does not comply with the concept of sharing, is punishment plausible? No, no one of any caliber deserves punishment for something one simply cannot comprehend. Like the newborn, Lennie simply cannot understand that he has the potential to kill. For example, Lennie wishes to see the newborn pups in chapter five and accidentally kills the one he plays with; he does not understand that he has the power to commit such an act. Therefore, Lennie should not be punished; rather he should be suppressed in a way that he cannot cause such things to occur. This goes to exemplify the judgment that comes about in this story, and through it, calls upon one's self to think twice before penalizing a personor any organismfor his, her, or its own ignorance.

How many times has one of us resorted to violence to solve a matter before once consulting on the matter? Most people forget what it is that separates beast from man our ability to think and our ability to put our thoughts into reason and that reason into purpose. So why is it that we abandon this truth when we come to terms with something that stresses our emotions? Our animal instincts fuel our violence. Violence is our primary solution to any problem that prevents us from doing what we wish. Through this story, one comes face to face with the concept of 'thought before action'. One sees this with Lennie numerous times; the time of the dead mouse at the beginning of the story, and the pup near the end. The cause for Lennie's barrage of death comes not from a desire to do so, but from an absence of thought. He never stops to consider what might happen if the pup or the mouse do not return to their shelter, to their food or water. He does not stop to think about what may construe from the constant and vigorous petting he inflicts upon them. Lennie's mistakes help one to realize that the lack of using one's brain before acting can result in very bad things. Another example is in the fifth chapter in which George is outside playing horseshoes with the others, leaving Lennie to the barn with the pups. George has realized many a time that Lennie is not capable of being by himself; he will cause trouble. However, without a second thought, George pays no heed to him, and as a result, Lennie kills a pup of the litter along with Curley's wife. George fails to keep an eye on Lennie, as he should. Had George thought of where Lennie might be and that Lennie is off by himself somewhere, Curley's wife and the pup may have lived. He should have thought before allowing Lennie to go off on his own.

Another important aspect of this book is that it illustrates the significance of companionship. Through the bond that George and Lennie had created, the two came ever closer to their dreams than ever before. Lennie gave George a sense of purpose in his live; this purpose gave George the will and the motivation to consider pursuing the American dream. George in return gave Lennie protection and guidance in his actions. Without the profound friendship that they have, both George and Lennie may have survived the cruelties of this earth physically, but not mentallyespecially in Lennie's casenor emotionally, and that would have ultimately destroyed them even before their work together on the ranch.

People have banned this book for its profound foul language and gruesome portrait of human nature, but they have not taken the time to consider the significance of such use of language. Though foul and obscure in purpose, this use of language accurately depicts the ilk of migratory farmers during the 10's. These farmers were uneducated, and therefore used foul language to voice their opinionmuch like today. Foul language is used through a character by the author to create a personality the author wants the character to posses. Foul language, though nasty and shunned upon, is allowed by the first amendment of the Bill of Rights as a form of the freedom of speech; therefore, one cannot ban a book based on this law. To do so is illegal and an attempt to void the Constitution of the United States. This book should not be banned for the reason that is exemplifies the significance of companionship. Without companionship, we would all become mindless robots without a care in the world for one another; the very image of what we strive to avoid.

To ban a book for its use of foul language is once again another example of why people need to think before they act. Those that banned the great work, Of Mice and Men did not stop to recollect the very aspects the novel teaches judgment, 'thought before action', the image the story portrays of the hardships of migratory farmers, nor the significance of companionship. One should blatantly see by no how much an edge the pros of this book have over the cons. To ban this bookOf Mice and Men, a great Naturalist novel of the twentieth centuryis immoral, an act of ignorance, and a suppression of what this country stands for.

Please note that this sample paper on John Steinbeck's Of Mice and Men:An Analysis of Moral Themes and Political Correctness is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on John Steinbeck's Of Mice and Men:An Analysis of Moral Themes and Political Correctness, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on John Steinbeck's Of Mice and Men:An Analysis of Moral Themes and Political Correctness will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

Plato's argument for the prenatal existence of the soul

If you order your cheap essays from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Plato's argument for the prenatal existence of the soul. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Plato's argument for the prenatal existence of the soul paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Plato's argument for the prenatal existence of the soul, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Plato's argument for the prenatal existence of the soul paper at affordable prices !

Plato's belief in attainable knowledge, the duality of being and the importance of a telos led to an intense, rich analysis of the nature of the soul. Examining his ideas of understanding, the forms and human nature itself, the modern philosopher gains a pivotal insight into the way knowledge is acquired. Some of Plato's most interesting opinions and dialogues however concern his belief on the soul and its survival both before birth and after death as well as the repercussions this has on its life while it inhabits the body. While areas of explanation, bias and information gained much later than Plato lived cause problems with his argument it remains astute and extremely relevant for philosophers today.

Plato believed that knowledge was possible however, it could only be attained through understanding that which is real and true. He inferred that if something is true then it must be immutable, immortal and absolute. By exposing the fallibility and subjective nature of human senses and perception he revealed our inability to really know anything based on physical experience, which he saw as belief, or opinion. Plato believed that there was however some realm of pure concepts and ideal prototypes for the objects and ideas that make up this world, or "Forms", that could be known. Plato concurred that no human knowledge can be taught during life, but must be "recollected" from some purer state of being in which the obtaining of knowledge did not rely on sensory perception. To come to understand this knowledge there must be some part of the individual that carried it even before birth, and this vessel was the soul.

All people have a seemingly innate knowledge of equality. Indeed people can recognise when two things had the same size, colour or weight and judge them equal while still retaining the knowledge that they are not absolutely equal. Plato explained that our ability to see this, without being taught, was in fact our soul's "recollection" of the Form equal. In the same way one can recognise a painting of a friend without believing the friend is in the room , Plato sought to show all things in the physical world like shadows, imperfect replicas of the Forms themselves. Our knowledge of these absolutes must then be gained before birth. This discovery played an important part in Plato's decision that human were dualist in nature and that the soul could survive the embodied state.

Once Plato felt he had "proved" dualism, he needed to define what it was that made body and soul different, especially that the soul was free from the restrictions the physical world placed on the body. The body is more likely to belong in the physical world and the soul in the realm of the Forms because of the soul's intangible nature. Plato follows that if the soul and body are in harmony and their combined telos of a life of virtue is reached, once the body dies, the soul returns to the realm of the Forms and being of a "kindred nature" is purified by them until it attains a state of wisdom. By contrast, if the body has had control during life and a person has not sought to attain a life of virtue the soul, confused and contaminated, will be dragged into the body of a lesser being, such as that of an animal, without wisdom.

Cheap custom writing service can write essays on Plato's argument for the prenatal existence of the soul

Plato's argument though logical and thorough is laced with problems. For example, many would argue now our knowledge of evolution insists that morality is in some ways evolution. It would seem that Plato's telos could in fact be evolutionary theory that humans, now physically well adapted should seek, through virtues of courage, wisdom and goodness, to progress in academic evolution. Even much of his theory about knowledge held by the soul, may be attributed to instinct that assists the survival of the species, such as altruism. Plato's other theories on the formation of society and the tripartite nature of the soul may be reviewed as specialisation and variation, important evolutionary tools.

As well as this, there are other questionable terms and ideas that Plato uses as proof. For example, his argument that the soul is invisible and unchanging is faulted in both terms. Even if we except his premise that the Forms are unchanging and immortal (which is why they can be known), we can not apply the same rules to the soul. Plato has already explained that the soul can be tainted, purified, even moved to another body where it cannot properly seek wisdom, such as a donkey. While his idea that the soul is more like the Forms remains true, there is no reason to believe that it should follow the same rules of immortality. Even its invisibility can be questioned in a modern age of electricity. While the soul still may not dissipate into thin air as suggested by Democritus , there is no reason to believe it will not, as a the energy in a battery would, lie dormant until the body decomposes and it no longer has a vessel in which to exist.

Plato's idea that only some can attain this state of wisdom is also problematic. If the soul is from the realm of the Forms and, as Plato says, exists in a state of purity and wisdom, how can it attain a tripartite structure? Would it not be more logical for all souls to be created equally prepared to attain understanding of the forms if they all come from a state of wisdom? Plato provides people who do not seek wisdom but do try to live their lives virtuously the ability to go into what he sees as virtuous animals (bees, wasps and ants) or even humans. "But no soul which has not practised philosophy, and is not absolutely pure when it leaves the body, may attain the divine nature." It seems that only those with reason as their soul element may ever attain that which is most desired by Plato, even if their telos is toward moderation or courage. These biased distinctions lessen my faith that Plato himself is examining the ideas rationally and impartially. Surely all people at least have the potential, if they study philosophy, no matter what their "tripartite soul" designates, to enter this divine realm! Plato does not make allowances for this and still asserts people should be happy with their lot in life, even though they will never attain the "divinity" he so highly prizes. There seems no reason why wisdom or knowledge should be favoured if that is not the individual's telos as designated by the soul and this problem suggests others throughout the argument.

It seems clear Plato's belief that the soul survives its embodied state stems from three central ideas; dualism, his view of knowledge and his belief in the need for each individual, society and soul to attain its telos. His argument is both rational and acute and he uses substantial evidence in his dialogues to explain and justify his motives. However, his argument is limited by the time in which it was written, our incomplete sources retained from the destruction of the Academy and Plato's reliance on premises which, when examined may be found faulty and weaken his argument. From Plato's reasoning for belief that the soul exists outside of the bodies mortal life it is easy to see how he reached both premises and conclusions. His, like all arguments had problems, but it still provides amazing insight into our understanding of knowledge and human nature and how we may have attained them. Although he did not have any specific theory, Plato's use of dialogue, reason and even spirituality are enlightening and challenging in both their own context and today.

Please note that this sample paper on Plato's argument for the prenatal existence of the soul is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Plato's argument for the prenatal existence of the soul, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom research papers on Plato's argument for the prenatal existence of the soul will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

GreaA conflict after highschool

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on GreaA conflict after highschool. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality GreaA conflict after highschool paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in GreaA conflict after highschool, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your GreaA conflict after highschool paper at affordable prices!

"Hey Erik, turn up that CD bro, that songs hella tight, I haven't heard Sublime for days." "For sure, Im so glad track is over, too much to do, you finish rolling that spliff yet B?" "Yeah man, hook me up with that light on the table, puff, puff." I laid back on Erik's plush, slightly worn leather couch purchased from the Value Village store downtown and watched as he displayed a phat French inhale. I was in a cloudy state with so much on my mind I didn't know where to begin. I was once again in the basement bedroom of my closest friend Erik doing what we did best with nothing else to and needing to conversant about life.

I was at a crossroads in my life, finishing up high school, about to make a decision some said was the biggest Id ever make. What to do after high school? And who better to discuss it with than a life long friend, one who had been there more times than I could count. We both shared ideas and dreams of what we wanted to do and see, some alike, some very dissimilar, but we both knew school somewhere would be the decision. I saw many of my friends, those less confident with themselves, join the military in hopes of finding there calling, for them I hope they do, for myself military was never of the question. I had an idea of higher learning, one which was not well understood, unclear of what I might face and what failure it may result in, perhaps that is why it is most appealing, the uncertainty. "Hey man, finish this up and lets roll down to Ryan's and see what he has going on over at his pad." Said Erik. "All right" I said. As we got up and headed outside towards my shiny green, German sports sedan, eyes startled by the bright, spring, afternoon sun as we exited the front door.

Erik and I had both been excepted to Western and kept it in mind as a good option and often fathomed what it might be like to attend the same school, like we had through middle and high school. Many of my classmates and friends were being accepted by large, famous Universities far from home, some for academics, some for athletics, and others with wealthy parents. For these people I had much happiness, but at the same time a slight jealousy arose wishing I had pursued a larger school. Lack of funds, laziness in the classroom, and a fear of being to far away from home pushed me away from this type of idea. Many of my closer friends were going to attend universities in Washington or in neighboring states, this had created a friendly competition among us for who would be the most successful and who would have the most fun.

Another close friend of mine was Danny, a true friend from which a relied on many of times. Danny and I had met in high school during a freshman geometry class, and right away shared many of the same interests. We had played football together and also ran track in the spring, we went through Spanish together, we got in weekend party fights together, with this man I shared much, which made it hard to separate near the summers end. Danny as well as myself had been excepted to ITT Tech. in Phoenix Arizona, this was a serious consideration for my future, to learn a growing trade with a prosperous salary. I would have the security of a good friend in a strange new place, but I just didn't know what I wanted to do! Danny spent hours trying to convince me of the job possiblities in computers, and the money I would be able to spend after only two years of school. I questioned him about what if computers didn't turn out to be my "thing" and I decided to peruse a different carrier, I would have no transferable credits and be forced to start all over again. Danny had understood my concerns and continued to offer what support he could, but I was decided that basic freshman classes were what I wanted. I wanted a strong foundation from which to build my future, one I could take anywhere I went, and apply it to any profession I wished. At this point in my life, not knowing what I want to with my uncertain future, could I spend so much money on a school that would only educate me about one thing I wasn't even sure if I really liked. Danny understood my concerns and offered what advice and opinions he had, but they were of no influence. I wished him the best of luck, knowing he would do well and assured him we'd stay in touch.

Danny left for school in early August, his phone calls to me are what caused the questions in my head, doubting I had made the right decision not join him in Phoenix. Danny bragged about his luxurious apartment, informed me that school was going by with ease that his school had found him a local job paying well in his field of computer networking. I was happy for him but wasn't sure if I had made the right decesion to not go, here he was having so much success and I wasn't even sure what school I was going to attend! It was time for myself to make a decision, there uncertainty of my life was making me mad, I was so close to a decision but I wasn't sure, I needed time alone to figure out what was right.

After a nights rest at home and a solemn day at school, I decided to stop by Erik's house after class and see what he was up to and do what we normally about this time of day. I rolled into Erik's drive way around o'clock on another beautiful spring afternoon, I parked my car beneath an old willow tree that stood about eighty feet tall. I stoped and gazed in awe as the sun lit up a bright background above the old willow tree and the light blue sky bordered its sagging branches forming a well defined silhouette. The warmth felt good on my skin as the sun beat down and the smell of fresh cut grass passed my nose while the sounds a distant guitar were heard in the back ground. I walked around to the back of Erik's house and up to the porch were he was sitting on an old wooden swinging bench practicing a few tunes. I had come to my decision on where to attend school, and I was going to tell him. I wanted to live on the west side of the state, and I was going to Western. I walked up the stairs and sat on a chair across the deck.. "How did your day go?" I asked. "Not bad, not bad, just Delia causing me drama, you know how she is. You think anything more about where your going to school?" "Yeah man, Im going to give Western a try, what about you? I replied. "My parents and I were thinking the same thing last night!" "Damn yo, were going to go to school together again." We decided not to room together from stories heard by older friends and their past experiences. At this point my mind was at rest, I had figured out the beginning of a plan for the future of my life, how much more complicated could it be I thought?

Later that same evening I went home to have dinner with parents, my mom usually cooks somthing up around 7 o'clock every night. I was going to tell them of my decision to attend Western, I was unsure of what I wanted to be but felt that a university was the place for my head to be. Im an only child so my decision was very waited upon, but defiantly not rushed. My mom hollered down stairs that dinner was ready, I went up stairs and sat beside my dad at the dinner table. We carried on a normal daily conversation discussing weather, and how my last week of school was going. I told them I was going to western. Both were excited I had made a decision to further my education and said they were going to help me as much as they could, they also made sure I was going to work for money and grades. Of this I was not concerned and was aware of the sacrifices I must make and I give appreciation to my parents for their help.

As the first quarter of school went by allot happened, and allot was noticed, that of myself, my friends, and those who surrounded me. Grades were descent and I was having a good time. The same could not be said for Erik, we were still close and hung out almost every day but something was changing in both of us, he had not yet adapted to life away from home and couldn't get use to classes. We talked to each other about our problems but his could not be solved, Erik moved back home on Christmas break. I now had no attachments of back home, and it wasn't bad, I was meting new people and enjoying my freedom. I had grown to realize everyone needs to be on there own and experience new things for themselves, I know now I made the right choice for myself by attending Western and wouldn't want it any other way.

Please note that this sample paper on GreaA conflict after highschool is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on GreaA conflict after highschool, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on GreaA conflict after highschool will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment from and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

Federalist v. Anti-Federalist Ideology

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Federalist v. Anti-Federalist Ideology. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Federalist v. Anti-Federalist Ideology paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Federalist v. Anti-Federalist Ideology, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Federalist v. Anti-Federalist Ideology paper at affordable prices!

The debates between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists brought up ideas that can now be traced back to our Constitution. Their disputes and differences in ideology underlie and continue to shape our system of government today. Despite their very different routes, they both shared the common goal to develop freedom, equality, liberty, and justice for all. However, their different modes of thought are still not settled and continue to be argued about today. For example, what is the proper division of power between state governments and the federal government? This concept of federalism and its significance on our state of affairs continues to be a point of contention between liberals and conservatives. Federalist and Anti-Federalist disagreement over the differing ideals of political community and potential threats to liberty led to competing conceptions about many theories, two of the most prominent being liberty and representation.

A prominent issue still dealt with today is whether the Constitution has created a system of government that preserves liberties. In 177, when the Framers were working towards ratifying the constitution, liberty was still a big issue. While some believed that the Constitution was a wonderful way to protect individual liberties, others insisted that it threatened independence. The Anti-Federalists, or "enemies of the Constitution," who believed that power should be vested in the states, unified themselves under the notion that true liberty is only possible in a small republic, ensuing that those who held power could be closely checked and all citizens could feel physically close to their rulers (Dilulio 167). This idea of the ruled feeling physically close to their rulers was of utmost importance to the Anti-Federalists, who felt that the biggest threat to their liberties was people unknowing who their representatives are. This is one reason the colonists rebelled against England; they had no liberty or representation. Furthermore, they felt that a strong national government would reduce the powers of the states and acquiesce public will. This ideology can be seen in "Brutus" Essay IV "[The people must be] possessed of the power of making the laws by which they are governed, [and any] representation, [must be] capable of understanding that true interest of the society for which it acts" (5). This idea plays a significant role in campaigns, where candidates typically try to appeal to a wide range of voters by using the appeal that they will always be near them to represent their interests and know exactly what they want.

The Federalists held quite different views on how our liberties should be respected. Madison held the opposite perspective of Anti-Federalist ideals by asserting in Federalist Paper No. 10 that liberty is safest in large or "extended" republics. In a large republic, it is more difficult for a dictator to take hold due to the variety of opinions and interests that are being expressed, which is why the source of liberty should be vested in individual rights. In Federalist No. 51, Madison argues that "a coalition of a majority of the whole society could seldom take place on any other principles than those of justice and the general good" (50). In other words, interests formed in larger republics create assorted interests and opinions, thus disabling any one group from obtaining too much power where it can potentially carry more influence than any other group in making legislation. The national government should be distant from the people, due to the fact that liberty could be threatened not only by a strong government but also by factions or interest groups who seek to gain too much power for the good of all society.

Cheap Custom Essays on Federalist v. Anti-Federalist Ideology

As a result of the varying, conflicting interests of Federalists and Anti-Federalists, the Constitution sought to find a compromise. The Constitution guarantees individual liberties, as favored by the Anti-Federalists, who later achieved the goal of implementing a Bill of Rights due to the fact that the "state bills of rights" turned out to be insufficient. In favor of the Federalists, the Constitution of 177 explicitly stated that the government "could do only what the Constitution gave it power to do, and nowhere in that document was there permission to infringe" on any freedoms (Dilulio 8).

In addition to liberty, another competing conception of politics that still continues to progress throughout our history is representation. The Anti-Federalists firmly held the belief that the knowledge needed to represent citizens is beyond that of being so well-educated. Ordinary citizens will know more about the common concerns of the people than wealthy citizens, who are more likely to distance themselves from the true interests of the people. This idea explains why the Anti-Federalists want actual representation, where the citizens are directly involved through participation in our government. Also, a large legislature is better than a small one because that way more interests can be expressed rather than the interests of just one faction.

The Federalists held opposite ideas about what believed to be the best theory of representation for the new nation. Virtual representation, where we democratically elected delegates to represent us as the best way to keep the citizens in contact with the doings of their government. The issue of the quality of the representatives, was clearly asserted by Madison representation should be in the hands of gentlemen of fortune and abilities, not in those of the middling politician" (The Founder's Constitution). This is important because it illustrates the biases of the Federalists, who were wealthy, well-educated, white, Protestant men, who wanted only the 'best and brightest' to represent them. Just like the Anti-Federalists, the Federalists were also acting out of self-interest because they wanted someone who was like them to represent them; someone who could understand their interests. In The Federalist No. 45, Hamilton rejects the Anti-Federalist on ideology of representation, by stating that "the nonagricultural working class knows that their habits in life have not been such as to give them those acquired endowments" (The Founder's Constitution). In addition, the Federalists held the belief that the size of the legislature should be small because only the most educated and elite have the real knowledge to know what decisions are best to make about our own personal lives.

The theories of representation adopted by the Federalists and Anti-Federalists sought to compromise "contending powers" rather than achieve a good balance (Zinn 101). The Great Compromise or Connecticut Compromise sought to reconcile this issue by allowing small states to dominate in the Senate and large states to predominate in the House. In addition, each state was allotted two representatives in the Senate, regardless of the size or population of their state. However, in the House, the number of Representatives was based on population.

Throughout our country's history, the constitution has been amended twenty-seven times. Each time, different groups have made their voices heard and changed legislation as a result. Nevertheless, the ideas of our Founders and the differences of the Federalists and Anti-Federalists still influence our society today. While the Federalists and Anti-Federalists held different ideologies for how our country should operate, both shared the common goals of "developing in our prosperity a deeper awareness of our government and "progressing the understanding of American government", and thus American history (The Liberty Bill Project). While some argue that the Federalists won the debate over the Constitution, others argue that the Anti-Federalist perspectives on our form of government still resonate in 1st century America. Even so, each age waves in a new time of progression where we can not only add another chapter to our history, but also proceed with a new understanding of liberty, equality, democracy, and justice from past history.

Works Cited

Dilulio, John J. Jr. and James Q. Wilson. American Government. New York Houghton Mifflin Company, 18.

Hamilton, Alexander, James Madison, and John Jay. The Federalist Papers. 181.

Story, Joseph. The Founder's Constitution. Volume 1, Chapter 1, Introduction. 187. The University of Chicago Press. Sept. 00 http//press pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/v1ch1I.html.

The Liberty Bill Project. 4 Sept. 00. http//www.hanover.k1.va.us/lms/New%0Folder/parts.htm.

Zinn, Howard. A People's History of the United States 14-Present. New York Harper Perennial, 15.

Please note that this sample paper on Federalist v. Anti-Federalist Ideology is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Federalist v. Anti-Federalist Ideology, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on Federalist v. Anti-Federalist Ideology will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

Group Leadership

If you order your cheap custom essays from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Group Leadership. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Group Leadership paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Group Leadership, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Group Leadership paper at affordable prices !

What do we mean when we say "group leadership"? What is it exactly? There is not a dictionary definition that can explain or give meaning to the phrase. In order to really understand the phrase "group leadership", we must separate it into two parts. We must define leadership. Then we must talk about group communication. What is leadership? Leadership is defined as a process of using communication to influence the behaviors and attitudes of others to meet group goals (Hackman and Johnson, 11). Group communication is the interaction of a group of people to achieve an interdependent goal (Galanes, Brilhart, & Adams, 000). So we can say that group leadership is using communication as the main tool to guiding and leading a group of people to accomplish interdependent goals. In order to get a greater comprehension of the subject, we must talk about two categories that relate to group leadership. They are the types of groups and the theoretical approaches to group leadership (Pearson, Nelson, Titsworth, & Harter, 00). With a knowledge of these two aspects, we will better understand the group leadership concept. Lastly, we will describe how group leadership and the workplace coincide. In the workplace, you can find group leadership issues and problems. We will also discuss any examples and try to formulate possible solutions. The following paragraphs will take us right into types of groups and approaches to group leadership.

We all interact in groups either at work, home, or school. In these groups you can certainly find communication. We can categorize groups into four types. They are task-oriented, relationship oriented, assigned, and emergent. Task-oriented groups are formed to accomplish one time jobs. Relationship oriented groups are types where you are affiliated with people for long durations. An example of this is your daily work groups. Assigned groups are ones where the members have been appointed or selected to participate in them. An example may be a person chosen to serve on a community watch council. Lastly, an emergent group is one that results from environmental conditions that lead to a cohesive group of individuals. An example of this is a study group attending a college (Pearson, Nelson, Titsworth, & Harter, 00).

Next, we must describe the theoretical approaches to group leadership. First, you have the style approach theory. It focuses on the pattern of behaviors that leaders exhibit in groups. There are major styles of leadership. They are democratic, laissez-faire, and autocratic. Democratic leaders encourage members to participate in group decisions. Laissez-faire leaders take a less caring approach to holding group discussion. Autocratic leaders hold strict control over their group. They make all decisions and assign all tasks. Secondly, you have the contingency approach theory. It assumes group situations vary, with different situations requiring different leadership styles. Then you have the communication competencies approach theory. It focuses on the communicative behaviors of leaders as they exercise interpersonal influence to accomplish group goals. Lastly, the distributed leadership approach theory states that each member is expected to perform the communication behaviors needed to move the group toward its' goal (Pearson, Nelson, Titworth, & Harter, 00)

Everyone experiences some type of group leadership at their place of employment. Most people engage in some kind of work group on a daily basis. In the work environment, you can find different levels of employment that require its' own distinct level of leadership. Within any organization, leadership begins at the top with either a president, CEO, or manager. This position is the head of the largest group, which is the company or business as a whole. There is a great deal of responsibility and obligation when running the daily operations of the company. So the responsibilities need to be dispersed among a group of leaders who can help to run the company effectively and efficiently. These leaders are now head of their own groups of people who need information to get their jobs done. Within these groups you will find the actual work groups. With effective group leadership, they can accomplish their required tasks, help to make decisions, and supply feedback. To help illustrate this concept in the workplace, I would like to use my place of employment as an example. I work in the aerospace industry and I work on military fighter aircraft everyday. At my level, I belong to the mass of the work group. We make up the largest number of employees at the site. We have different work centers that are responsible for a certain job process for the aircraft on the floor. I belong to the electrical work center. I am an electrical mechanic. There are other work centers such as structural mechanics, engine mechanics, inspectors, materials, support equipment, tooling, electrical back shops (component wiring), and methods planning. These are all examples of daily work groups. Each one must communicate internally and then communicate externally with the other work centers. Each group has its' own leadership in place to ensure things are moving forward and tasks are being accomplished. In my specific job, I work with a group of people that are responsible for the incorporation of new electrical systems in the airplane. We answer to an aircraft lead worker who is responsible for the entire flow of the aircraft while it is in production flow. We must communicate to that person to let them know what each person has accomplished everyday to stay current to the planning and budget. They in turn must answer to our supervisor. They must communicate the status of the aircraft and discuss any issues with parts and the time schedule. The supervisor then must report to the production floor manager the information that was received from the lead worker. The production floor manager then attends a meeting every morning to report the progress of all the aircraft on the production flow. At this stage in the communication cycle, he is now speaking with the leadership group. This is the group that is responsible for the financing, work recruitment, and site operation. In each of the groups leading up to the meeting, leadership within the groups allowed the information to make its' way up to the upper management level. Without effective group leadership, the channel in which the information travels can be cut off and the business could fail. One issue of group leadership that does occur at my work place is the ever present lack of communication. I am not speaking of the everyday communication that you need to get your job done. I am talking about the "behind the scenes" communication that keeps the place running. We experience issues where special tooling is required to perform some of the work on the aircraft and its' parts. The workers have repeatedly communicated this with their supervisors and left it at that. When the time comes and they need the tool, it is not on hand. Group leadership failed the workers who needed the tool. Ultimately, the leadership is failing its' customers. What needs to happen in this case is that the supervisors need to get together with its' leadership and discuss the whole situation. They must be able to effectively relay their message and stress the importance of the need for the tool. They must find a way to communicate at their "level" so that they can see that there is a problem and it needs to be fixed. In this case, the supervisor is the leader of the group and it depends on how well he can communicate to this particular group in order to get the results that he needs.

Cheap College Papers on Group Leadership

The key to group leadership is communication. Leaders may use different styles of leadership to get people to work together for a common goal. Leaders do this without being aggressive or demanding. In order for a group of people to work together and achieve a desired task, good group leadership is a must.

Please note that this sample paper on Group Leadership is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Group Leadership, we are here to assist you. Your cheap research papers on Group Leadership will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

Chivalry and gawain

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on chivalry and gawain. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality chivalry and gawain paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in chivalry and gawain, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your chivalry and gawain paper at affordable prices!

Chivalry was an ideal way of behavior for nobility during the Middle Ages. In Gawain and the Green Knight, the main character Gawain strives to live up to these ideals. These ideals, however, are too hard for Gawain to live up to at the time. When Gawain stumbles, he is able to make himself a better man because of this experience. He shows us that man makes mistakes, but a great man is one who recognizes that he is wrong and tries to learn from the mistake. By learning from his mistakes, he is coming closer to the ideal of chivalry than if he tried to hide them.

Chivalry was not intended to be restrict the nobility from being the people that they really are. Instead, it was meant to help them maintain their Christian ideals. It was supposed to help them to live up to the commandments that God had given to them. The code was supposed to help the nobility to become closer to their God. But, it made things for them extremely difficult, because they were viewed as inferior if they did not always live up to the code. The code was very hard to follow all of the time for the nobility.

Gawain tries to live up to the chivalrous ideals of his time. The problem is that these ideals are too hard for a man to always fulfill. Gawain was not a superhuman, and therefore could not always do exactly what he was supposed to do. He was, however, one of the greatest men of his time. The Green Knight refers to the goodness of Gawain when he says, "She made trial of a man most faultless by far" (6). Gawain was one of the best men of his time. He was respected everywhere. He strived with all of his might to follow the ideals of chivalry to the fullest. So, if there was anyone who should be able to live up to the ideals of chivalry, it should have been Gawain.

Although Gawain should be the one man that is able to hold to all of the ideals of chivalry, he is not able to do so. He fails while attempting to conform to the chivalrous ideals. Gawain does not fail because he is a bad person, he fails because he is a human being and , therefore, is not perfect. No matter how hard he tried, he was bound to make a mistake simply because he is only a man. Gawain admits to his failure when he says, "Now am I faulty and false, that fearful was ever Of disloyalty and lies," (8-8). Gawain recognizes that he was not able to live up to the standards of chivalry. He had tried as hard as humanly possible and failed. Gawain was one of the most respected and loyal men of his time. If he is not able to follow the code of chivalry, what mortal man could be able to do so.

Gawain was a great man that earned the respect of his peers. He was as close to the ideal of chivalry as humanly possible. Yet, Gawain still failed in his attempts at being the chivalrous knight. If one of the greatest men of the time is not able to be completely chivalrous, how could any other man think of being able to meet all the obligations that it entails? The answer is that they could not possibly think of being wholly chivalrous. It is in human nature to make mistakes. The only thing that could live up to these ideals completely would be God.

The nobles of the Middle Ages were not able to live up to the ideals that their society tells them to follow. No matter how hard they try, it is in their nature to make mistakes and fail. When people realize this, they become discouraged with the ideals. They will give up on trying to live up to these ideals and only put on a show when they need to do so. They will only be trying to cover up the fact that they are making mistakes. In reality, they will not even be trying to live up to the ideals of chivalry. This will eliminate the whole purpose of having a code of conduct.

With the people no longer being faithful to and striving to maintain the ideals of chivalry, there will be a great amount of immorality taking place. The people will be sneaky and deceiving in the way they go about breaking the rules. The will do this so that they avoid being looked down on as failures. The want to be looked up to with reverence and as heroes, not as failures. This will make them try to hide what they really are and prevent them from improving themselves. Which will make things worse than they were before the code of chivalry was put into place. The whole point of the system, which is to respect other nobles and further the Christian cause, is not going to be lived up to. In order for them to get back to their original ideals and again live up to the ideals that they have set, there would need to be changes to the way they went about living up to their ideals.

The system of chivalry was not perfect. It's ideals were good, it was just too hard for any man to be able to always live up to them. And if a man made a mistake he was looked down upon and disgraced. This led to people covering up their mistakes and not learning from them, unless they were caught and publicly humiliated. A change had to be made to stop the spread of immorality and deceit. Gawain shows us the way to do so after he fails in his incident with the Green Knight. Instead of hiding the fact that he messed up, Gawain makes the fact that he failed known publicly. In addition he wore the ladies' green belt on him at all times as a reminder to himself and everyone else of his failures (505-5 ). When he returns home, Gawain approaches King Arthur and tells him of the belt, "This is the badge of false faith that I was found in there, And I must bear it on my body till I breathe my last" (50-5 0). Gawain steps outside of the normal behavior of the nobility of his time and admits his mistake. He made a mistake and instead of making the fault worse by lying about it, he learns from it and uses it to make himself a better man.

Gawain, by breaking the code of chivalry and learning from his mistake, becomes a better man. Since he wears the green belt as a reminder of his blunder, he is respected by his peers even more than he already was. The rest of the knights of the round table, seeing what Gawain does, wear there own green belts as a sign of respect (5 5-5 8). The rest of the knights realize that Gawain is improving himself by admitting to his mistake and learning from it. Gawain has now set a new standard for the rest of the knights to follow. Gawain is a trendsetter for making changes to the way that nobility acts when they have failed to live up to everything that they have promised they would.

Not only is Gawain more respected after his mistake than he was before, but he also learns from his mistake and knows that he has to correct his faults. He will strive to stay away from what caused him problems. Gawain says, "For where a fault is made fast, it is fixed evermore" (5 ). He recognizes that he is a man and is therefore faulty. This is the first thing he has to do to make himself better. Men can only try to correct their shortcomings after they realize they have them. Gawain makes people see this because he was supposed to be the most chivalrous knight, and not even he could always be perfect. This made people realize that they had their own faults that needed to be corrected. Gawain starts a new trend with the knights of the round table to look at themselves for their own faults before the criticize other people for their shortcomings as chivalrous nobility.

Gawain's new approach is one that is a breath of fresh air to the stiff way of doing things that is called chivalry. His actions show that people are going to make mistakes and not always follow the code, but when they do stumble they have to pick themselves up, learn from the experience and not be ashamed that it happened. Instead of hiding their faults, the knights should embrace them and work with them to make themselves better people. By doing this, the men will be coming closer to the original intent of the code of chivalry than they would by hiding their discretions and making the same mistake repeatedly.

Gawain and the Green Knight shows us that men are flawed and will never be able to fully live up to standards of conduct. But, shaming them for making mistakes only makes things worse. Men can only become better people by making mistakes and learning from them. They have to look at themselves and see that they are not perfect and accept that fact. Recognizing and trying to correct their mistakes will help people to behave in the way that the code of chivalry intended them to act.

Please note that this sample paper on chivalry and gawain is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on chivalry and gawain, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on chivalry and gawain will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment from and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

History – Between The Wars

If you order your essay from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on History – Between The Wars. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality History – Between The Wars paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in History – Between The Wars, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your History – Between The Wars paper at affordable prices with custom writing service!

History Between The Wars

Research Essay

By Toni

Hoover and Roosevelt had very different ideas on how the Depression should be handled. This was almost entirely a result of two basic differences in their schemas; Hoover was a Republican, and had basically worked his way through life and saw himself as a self-made man, while Roosevelt was a Democrat, and had been born in to a rich family and a silver spoon in his mouth. As we can easily see, in many ways these two are complete opposites which created extremely different impacts and responses by each individual towards the depression. It seems that Roosevelts and Hoovers policies were diverse in several ways.

Custom Essays on History – Between The Wars

Having taken at least partial credit for the economic boom of the Twenties when he campaigned for the presidency in 18, Hoover had trouble personally accepting the end of the boom or understanding just how bad the crash and Depression would be. Hoover initially felt that the Depression was a temporary dip in the economic cycle caused more by psychological fears than economic realities. Therefore, President Hoover responded to the crash of the stock market and the beginning of the Depression by telling everyone that as long as Americans didnt let panic cause them to take demanding and uncalled-for action, the country would witness a brief and limited recession and then resume its economic boom. Confidence was the key. He then waged a campaign to convince businessmen to keep wages up so that consumption levels would not decline. Businessmen maintained wage levels temporarily, but cut back on the number of their employees because of dropping consumption levels. Hoover also failed in his confidence campaign to convince consumers to keep purchasing. Seeing other workers laid off and fearing for their own future, laborers cut back on purchases; guaranteeing further layoffs.

Hoover's long term key to economic recovery was that government intervention should be kept to an absolute minimum and to restore the confidence of the business community in the economy of the United States. Only if businessmen reinvested their capital in the economy would the country be able to recover. Hoover fought desperately to maintain a balanced federal budget. This was extremely difficult given the demands placed on the government to launch various relief programs and a shrinking revenue base because of the huge deflation rate. Hoover states The course of unbalanced budgets is the road to ruin. Therefore, he pursued for over three years a conservative business-oriented approach to Americas' recovery.

In the name of restoring business confidence, President Hoover also rejected demands by Americans that the currency system be inflated. Many Americans reasoned that since the economic disaster, the country suffered from immense deflation as hundreds of millions of dollars were withdrawn from circulation. Then the appropriate prescription was inflation. They urged the government to abandon the gold standard and flood the economy with printed currency. Hoover rejected such demands arguing that a stable or hard currency system had always been a requirement for business investment. If the currency system was inflated by the government, businessmen would refuse to reinvest their funds in the economy. This would simply delay the day when economic recovery could begin therefore convincing Hoover to refuse the demands for inflation.

By 1 unemployment had reached 4.% nationwide. This was such an enormous problem that only the federal government, with its borrowing power and its ability to print currency, could cope with it. Nonetheless, Hoover refused to budge. President Hoover did increase federal spending on public works as a way of trying to lessen unemployment. $700 million on such projects in 11 was extraordinarily high. However, he grew more hostile with the passage of time believing a huge work relief program might be as demoralizing as a dole. When Congress passed the Emergency Relief and Construction Act in 1, Hoovers administrators did everything in their power to limit its impact through the implemented process.

Hoover finally gave in to his stubborn attitude and called for and obtained the Reconstruction Finance Corporation which was a government lending agency that made long-term low interest loans to banks and big businesses in hopes of prompting economic recovery. While the RFC loans did prevent the peak of the banking crisis until 1, they failed to promote economic recovery. Expansion would obviously be the last thing on the minds of most businessmen in 1. Causing businesses not to get loans to expand, workers werent rehired, and there was no increase in consumption by rehired laborers. While the RFC was a good start, it was according to Hoovers attitude and his conservative business-oriented philosophy and approach. The loans benefited the banks and big businesses and the unemployed, homeless, and needy were left to go hungry and feel like failures. President Roosevelt was then elected in 1 and quickly created a program to create jobs and recover America.

Roosevelts general policy was to make work for anyone and everyone who was redundant; it didnt matter if the work was pointless, and didnt really need to be done. He managed to create the "New Deal" in the hundred days with help of his 'brain trust'. In order to buy time to solve the banking crisis caused by bank runs since 1, FDR declared a Bank Holiday temporarily shutting down every bank in the country by executive order. Congress then instantly passed the Emergency Banking Act of 1, lending government money to unstable banks and thereby restoring confidence. Shortly thereafter FDR and Congress created a more permanent solution - the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. FDIC was and still is a government-sponsored insurance program guaranteeing the security of deposits in member banks. If the bank fails, the FDIC compensates depositors, bringing back faith to America.

Many of FDR's famous alphabet agencies were quickly established to control the economic depression by pumping national funds into the economy. This made a great impact on the economy and things began looking up for America. The Federal Emergency Relief Administration (FERA) provided funds outright to the needy, whereas the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC), the Public Works Administration (PWA), and the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) put millions of unemployed to work on public projects. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) protected depositors in the event of bank failures; the National Recovery Administration (NRA) regulated prices and wages and promoted fair business competition; and the Agricultural Adjustment Administration (AAA) tried to help farmers by reducing excess production and increasing farm prices this alphabet policy created relief for many and America looked as though it was on the road to recovery.

By the end of Roosevelt's second term, for the first time, the federal government assumed responsibility for the welfare of American citizens. For individuals, there was relief for the jobless and the needy, insurance programs for the aged and the unemployed, and subsidies for farmers. The PWA (public works administration) spent $6 billion enabling building contractors to employ 650,000 workers who might otherwise have been jobless. The PWA built everything from schools and libraries to roads and highways. The agency also financed the construction of cruisers, aircraft carriers, and destroyers for the navy. On a broader level, FDRs domestic policies allowed for the manipulation of credit and interest rates to promote economic expansion, and a vast range of economic planning policies aimed at priming the pump with tax adjustments, government spending, and active intervention in the private sector. However, despite these efforts of the New Deal relief and recovery programs, the economy recovered only slightly between 1 and 15. While laissez-faire capitalism died, democracy and capitalism survived the tremendous ordeal of the Great Depression. If the New Deal failed to end the Great Depression, its successes still transformed America permanently.

Hoover and Roosevelt had a variety of different ideas from a political view, Hoover once said; No president must ever admit he has been wrong. Hoover acted boldly during his presidency, it became more and more apparent that the Depression was worsening and his program of confidence, voluntarism, and business support wasnt working, He refused to recognize that his philosophy and programs werent working. Rather than try something different, he clung rigidly to his program, became more defensive and convinced himself and Americans that things were getting better, but instead lost the support of the nation. Roosevelt on the other hand .

Please note that this sample paper on History – Between The Wars is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on History – Between The Wars, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on History – Between The Wars will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment from custom writing service and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!